Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: REPLICATION
Thanks Carel!
PSB and LSB features available in 9i and later.
What version are/is your customer you on?
:8163
OS? : Sun solaris
How much is 'minimum outage'? : 2hrs.
>How much data-loss is allowed? : theoretically ZERO
Is it abig database? : 30 to 40gb but expecting more growth.
What are the arguments against Standby/Data Guard?
:They don't want.
Thanks
>
>From: Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl>
>Reply-To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>Subject: Re: REPLICATION
>Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:37:46 +0200
>
>At 03:12 PM 6/29/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I have setup production database full replication on seconday box in
> >READ-ONLY MODE.Users are accessing the box boxes for DMLand select on
> >PRODUCTION and select for secondary box.In case of disaster (suppose
> >production database are having problem like disk failure ,controller
>failure
> >etc) can I make READ-ONLY MODE database to READ-WRITE mode.
> >
> >Here is my problem:
> >I have 2 identical box name db01 and db02.On db01 production instance is
> >running.I want to use processing capacity of db02 24x7.I want to setup
> >replication in such a way that in case of disaster (failure of db01) can
>we
> >switch to db02 with minimun outage.
> >Client don't want standby or dataguard solution.
>
>What version are/is your customer you on? OS? How much is 'minimum outage'?
>How much data-loss is allowed? Is it abig database? What are the arguments
>against Standby/Data Guard?
>
>On Oracle 7 I implemented a home-grown DR configuration based on triggers.
>This was usefull for an underused database on an overpowered serverd.
>Basically there was a small table storing the actual state of the database.
>It was standby all the time, forced so by some custom code in the dbstart
>script. Pre-insert/update/delete triggers prevented anyone from changing
>colums, except the replication-user. Replication was performed
>asynchronously. Failover meant just changing the 'active state' in the
>special table and go for it.
>
>Later, in 8i, this was migrated to an Advanced Replication solution. This
>site is out of sight now.
>
>Data Guard with Logical Standby _can_ help, but with quite a few
>constraints. I've setup a similar configuration, however, There 'was a
>Physical Standby for DR, and a Logical Standby for reporting. I wouldn't go
>for the LSB/DR combination on 9i. For 10g I haven't dobe enough
>investigation to give a clue. It might be better. When you are on processor
>licenses, you might be able to run the query/LSB on the same server as the
>DR/PSB database. It depends on the amount of redo that's created, and how
>much the server suffers from the recovery on PSB _and_ LSB together with
>the planned reports on the LSB.
>
>I think it is technically spoken possible to create a replication mechanism
>to synchronyze db01 and db02. However, don't underestimate the amount of
>work for creating and testing such an environment, not to mention
>monitoring, management and maintenance to keep the thing up, running,
>accurate, etcetera....
>
>
>
>Regards, Carel-Jan
>
>===
>If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok)
>===
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
>put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
>--
>Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
>FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Tue Jun 29 2004 - 16:08:07 CDT