Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: db block size
Lex,
I certainly did not say "close to useless"! Anyplace. Anywhere.
My first comment was in response to people using different block sizes to help gain sql efficiency - using 2k blocksize for reference or lookup tables. This, to me, is like trying to squeeze water from a desert. It can be done. But it is waste of time.
I agree that TTS is a great idea for warehouses. But, again, not much use for an OLTP database.
So there,
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional
-----Original Message-----
From: Lex de Haan [mailto:lex.de.haan_at_naturaljoin.nl]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 3:11 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: db block size
Hi Tom,
please allow me to repeat what my beloved ex-colleague Pete Sharman
explained before, in his well-known concise and subtle style: Oracle has
always positioned this feature to enhance transportable tablespaces (TTS) --
which is certainly not "on the edge" functionality, I would say; I think TTS
is both pretty powerful and pretty useful.
so it is kind of unfair to label it as close to useless as a conclusion of this email thread?
Kind regards,
Lex.
-----Original Message-----
This sounds like one of those "efficiencies on the edges" discussion. Everybody makes great points. But the real end result might be a gain in efficiency by about a decimal of a percent.
Another great Oracle innovation that *may be* used in about 1% of the installations. My gut feeling is that Oracle is adding functionality that not many of us would use.
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.htmlput 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org