Re: Help with sql identifying dup constraints

From: Daniel Fink <Daniel.Fink_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:20:51 -0600
Message-id: <40D0B9B3.7040907@sun.com>

Barb,

Guess what... search_condition (and dba_views.text) are still LONG in 10g!

Dan

Barbara Baker wrote:
> Daniel:
>
> This particular database is indeed 9i.
> This is so cool! This little gem will come in handy.
>
> I think I'll just wait 'till Pints has one of their
> scotch-tasting extravaganzas. Might save me money in
> the long-run :)
>
> You know, in one of the original posts, Jacques said
> "Shouldn't this column have been changed to a CLOB in
> 9.2?"
>
> I double-checked, and even on a new database (not
> migrated up from 8i, search_condition is a long. It
> does make me wonder why Oracle didn't make that change
> . . . .
>
>
> Thanks for the code!
>
> Barb

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wed Jun 16 2004 - 16:18:11 CDT