Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: 10046 Trace and Oracle Time Machine

Re: 10046 Trace and Oracle Time Machine

From: Daniel Fink <Daniel.Fink_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:57:39 -0600
Message-id: <40B253B3.4070905@sun.com>


Raj,

The first thing that comes to mind is that the variable tkprof uses to keep track of elapsed time is not large enough, so it eventually gives bogus values. The fact that the trace file is so large also clues me that actual values for elapsed time are not getting incremented properly (at some point). The other thing I could think of is that the elapsed times are summed together for all parallel processing (but parallel is not indicated in what I see in the file...which means it may or may not exist...I have not used tkprof in so long, I don't recall what it outputs in the Row Source Op.).

That's all I can think of on this Monday morning...

Daniel



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
Received on Mon May 24 2004 - 14:55:58 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US