Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RAC Experiences
Don,
Thank you very much for your detailed reflections on this stuff. I think everybody should run RAC, of course, since I'm the technical director of a consulting company that employs about 60-80% of the RAC expertice in Denmark... Heh-heh.
Now, without wanting to implicate Tom Kyte with whatever rantings I come up with, I do think it's appropriate to quote Tom on one very clever thing here: "RAC is like an amplifier. If your application is designed to take advantage of RAC, then fine. It not, it could make things worse.".
Mogens
Don Granaman wrote:
> BTW: Executive management's preferred "solution" to this was bigger
> hardware. Only after getting to a cluster of fully-loaded Sun E10Ks and the
> biggest Symmetrix that EMC could offer, with still poor performance, did
> they *really* push the $200/hour (each) outsourced (USA) designer/developers
> to change the code - and the way the system worked.
>
> -Don Granaman
> OraSaurus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Granaman" <granaman_at_cox.net>
> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 12:27 PM
> Subject: Re: RAC Experiences
>
>
>
>>Since I have posted some of the things that might make one think that any >>consideration of RAC is on the lunatic fringe, I'll make some amends >>(perhaps)... >> >>OPS/RAC can be useful and relatively stable. Sometimes you just hit the >>limit (either financially or physically) of vertical scalability and have
>>go horizontal. The nature of the application and its RAC implementation
>>IMHO, crucial. Simply trying to prop up a poorly-designed application
>>a truck load of RAC hardware can be something of a disaster. >> >>One such (painful) OPS experience of mine was an application that
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri May 21 2004 - 15:33:28 CDT
![]() |
![]() |