RE: Anyone used the hpux_sched_noage parameter?

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 11:18:04 -0500
Message-ID: <FBE1FCA40ECAD41180400050DA2BC54004E93995@qtiexch2.qgraph.com>

I think I'll still save this feature for the future -- no need to muddy = up the waters more with this conversion from 8i to 9i.

Thanks for the reply!

Rich

Rich Jesse                        System/Database Administrator
rich.jesse_at_quadtechworld.com      QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 1:50 AM
> Subject: Re: Anyone used the hpux_sched_noage parameter?

>=20
>=20

> Rich:

>=20

> I have used this parameter in many of the RAC benchmarks and got good
> results. It basically helps oracle process to run on realtime=20
> priority.
> Do a man rtsched for more details.

>=20
> KG

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 11:14:46 CDT