Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 9205 Query behavior
you might want to check out this (related) bug:
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showFrameDocument? p_database_id=BUG&p_id=3327512
fixed in 10g Release 2, and I guess it will be backported too...
Cheers,
Lex.
> When trying out hints I only focused on no_unnest and totally forgot about
> no_merge which should have been the more obvious one. That is consistent
> with the result I got using the rownum pseudo-column which also prevents
> merging.
>
> regards
>
> Wolfgang Breitling
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Mon May 17 2004 - 11:25:52 CDT
![]() |
![]() |