Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: SQL Server vs. Oracle
Regrettably they did not add in the savings if one is using Linux vs. =
Windoze.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:mhthomas_at_yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:50 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: SQL Server vs. Oracle
My favorite part:
"Businesses can save approximately $32,600 per DBA per year by using Oracle Database 10g in place of Microsoft SQL Server 2000."
OMG. :-) Regards,
Mike Thomas
=09
=09
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wed May 12 2004 - 09:19:59 CDT
![]() |
![]() |