Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Transaction_audit FALSE
Piggybacking off DDL Audit thread....
I unset the transaction_auditing parameter to reduce redo logs and saw
essentially no
change in redo size generated.
81730/Solaris 8
-----Original Message-----
From: Tanel Põder [mailto:tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 8:00 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
One alternative way would be to use logminer if your transaction_auditing parameter is set true (default in 9.2), that way you'll get quite a lot of information about the user into the redolog as well, when they start the DDL recursive transaction...
Tanel.
> I need to create a DDL auditing trigger (initially, for a 9.2.0.4
database)
> that logs *extremely* detailed information about exactly who, what,
> when, from where, ad infinitum whenever *anyone* makes modifications
> to a
schema.
> Being able to tell that they had a hangnail on their right thumb when
> it
hit
> the spacebar between "alter" and "table" might even prove useful.
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Tue May 04 2004 - 16:28:20 CDT
![]() |
![]() |