Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle Database Resource Manager
Dick, Pete,
Thanks for your comments. It's kinda what I thought. Perhaps the DBA got his features mixed up.
Larry
-----Original Message-----
I've tried it, problem was that I could not implement it very easily. =
It worked as advertised, but I did not see it as a resource hog either.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Pete Sharman
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 2:27 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Cc: Peter Ross Sharman
Subject: RE: Oracle Database Resource Manager
I don't know who the instructor was, but he or she is talking crap (pardon = my French). Really, what would be the point of implementing a resource man= ager that itself takes too many resources?
One thing that people get confused about with the Resource Manager, BTW, is= when it actually takes effect. It's when the resource being managed is ex= hausted i.e. if you're allocating different amounts of the CPU utilization = to different groups, you WON'T see Resource Manager kick in until CPU utili=zation hits 100%. After all, it's not a problem till then, right?
=
Pete
=
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] =
On Behalf Of Wolfson Larry - lwolfs
Sent: Tuesday, 4 May 2004 3:51 AM
To: 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
Subject: Oracle Database Resource Manager
I've been thinking about implementing this for some of our resource intensive databases.
One of our DBAs came back from a class where the instructor said DRM was very resource intensive itself.
I'm not talking about complex implementations.
Can I get some feedback one way or the other?
Thanks
Larry Wolfson
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Mon May 03 2004 - 15:35:32 CDT
![]() |
![]() |