Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: CPU upgrade caused application slow down

RE: CPU upgrade caused application slow down

From: Khedr, Waleed <Waleed.Khedr_at_FMR.COM>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 00:18:36 -0400
Message-ID: <42BBD772AC30EA428B057864E203C9991158FE@MSGBOSCLF2WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM>


Imagine you have a session that does a Nested Loop using an index and = the results are being sent over the network. If total bytes the needs to be sent is B and the bandwidth is W and the = time of execution is T:

Then data pushing rate is B / T

W is constant.

If B / T is < W then transfer time will be B / W=20

Now using faster CPU's T is smaller which causes B / T to be bigger = value plus the machine is capable of processing more sql requests in the = same time.

I'm not sure if this could be reflected as some <sqlnet/data to client> = wait event.

-----Original Message-----
From: zhu chao [mailto:chao_ping_at_vip.163.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:54 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: CPU upgrade caused application slow down

Hi, Waleed:

    That is what I do everytime I reorgnized a table. The table that got reorgnized was an IOT table with Overflow segment. After table = recreated, I
move overflow segment to make it sorted.

    One more thing, the table is not a key table of the applications = running
on this server, thoug the table is pretty big in size.

    I guess the difference in response time is from the network = layer.But I
cannot prove it. No improvement in response is ok for CPU upgrade, as = CPU
time is just part of the total response time, but it should not get longer:(, right?

Thanks
Zhu Chao

> Wondering if you have one major index that gets used most of the time =
=3D
> using range scan.
> If this is true, then reorganizing the table might have damaged a =
little =3D
> bit the clustering factor.
>
> If this is the case, then loading the table sorted on the columns used =
=3D
> by that index should help a lot.
>
> Regards,
>
> Waleed



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:15:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US