Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: a pl/sql question
Hi Donald,
My example was only meant to show that sql%notfound would never be hit. One of these days I'll learn to add comments to my code ;-)
Regards,
-----Original Message-----
From: Freeman, Donald [mailto:dofreeman_at_state.pa.us]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:12 AM
To: Oracle-L (E-mail)
Subject: FW: a pl/sql question
> The difference in this case is your example selects into a variable
=
instead of directly updating the table. I followed up on this by =
reading the PL/SQL manual (RTFM?) and there are several warnings about = using cursor attributes including one similiar to your example. What I = wrote is only good for the narrow usage I showed ;-). On page 6-40 of =the 9.2 PL/SQL Users Guide is:
"This information in this e-mail is intended solely for the addressee and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please notify the sender that you have received this e-mail in error, and delete the copy you received."
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 11:19:16 CDT
![]() |
![]() |