Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Registry remnants after uninstalling 9.2 on W2K server
I would uninstall again and this time go into the registry and under
local machine \ software delete the oracle key.
Jeffrey Beckstrom
Database Administrator
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
1240 W. 6th Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113
>>> Luis.deUrioste_at_L-3com.com 4/23/04 9:20:22 AM >>>
Paul,
My guess is that the 3rd party software is looking for the default =
oracle home, which is probably set to the first Oracle install in this
=
case would be the 9.2 install. First thing I would do is change the =
default home to the 8.06 home and see what happens. Messing with the =
registry entries can be messy.
Luis
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Vincent [mailto:Paul.Vincent_at_uce.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 6:06 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Registry remnants after uninstalling 9.2 on W2K server
OK, there's no excuse for such carelessness: The development team
wanted =
to revert a W2K server, which had Oracle 9.2 installed (but no
databases =
yet) to Oracle 8.0.6, in order to test a migration path. So I stopped
=
the Oracle services, ran the Oracle Installer and uninstalled 9.2, =
removed the remnant directories, then rebooted the server. I then got
=
the install CD for Oracle 8.0.6 and installed it into its own Oracle =
Home.
=20
Fine - no problems.
=20
Except that when the developers went to install their 3rd-party =
application package, it threw up error messages which clearly showed it
=
was looking for files in the old Oracle 9.2 Home directories - which of
=
course no longer existed.
=20
Clearly I screwed up by not realising (I realise now!) that there must
=
have been lingering Registry entries relating to Oracle 9.2, which I =
should have identified and deleted before proceeding with my =
installation of Oracle 8.0.6.
=20
So my question is: is it a "safe" course of action to simply remove =
those lingering 9.2 registry entries? If so, which entries should I =
remove in order for the server to only regard itself as possessing a =
single, 8.0.6, Oracle Home? (I've not been through this particular =
process before, though I'm OK with making Registry edits in general).
Or =
is this too risky a procedure, and would I be better off uninstalling
=
8.0.6, removing ALL Oracle registry entries (in which case, could =
someone please give me a checklist of relevant entries?), and then =
re-installing 8.0.6. As I mentioned, no database has been created yet,
=
simply Oracle software installed.
=20
Definitely one of THOSE days...
=20
Regards,
=20
Paul Vincent
Database Administrator
University of Central England
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis -- -- Type: application/ms-tnef -- File: winmail.dat ----------------------------------------------------------------Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Apr 23 2004 - 08:26:53 CDT
![]() |
![]() |