Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Informatica Bulk Mode behavior
I would ask the developers how they configured the commit interval (if =
it's set to a very low value)
Waleed
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Jeff [mailto:jeff.thomas_at_thomson.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:33 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Informatica Bulk Mode behavior
List,
Is anyone familiar with how Informatica's bulk mode works? =20
We have a situation where I created a 4GB tablespace for a new and
simple=20
truncate/load operation from Informatica, around 7 million rows
estimated=20
to take up 1.5GB. =20
=20
Using bulk mode, which appears to be a direct load (in the SQL cache,
the=20
INSERT statement has a hint that I've never seen before: SYS_DL_CURSOR
which=20
I assume stands for Direct Load), they run out of space in the
tablespace after=20
about 200K rows have been inserted.
If I then manually rebuild the table, the 200K rows gets compressed back
down=20
to one extent.
So there's a lot of either empty or preallocated space. Thinking
somehow=20
the high-water mark was the culprit, I manually truncated the table
before=20
they reran their job. =20
Still the same problem. =20
If the job runs in 'normal' mode, which is row-by-row processing, it
runs fine,=20
although of course, performance is quite poor.
Any ideas/experience as to how this bulk mode operates?
Thanks.
Email: jeff.thomas_at_thomson.net
Indy DBA Master Documentation available at: http://gkmqp.tce.com/tis_dba
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.htmlput 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
![]() |
![]() |