Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: [Q] what differtent between logical standby database and physical standby DB?
Um, in the physical standby case, aren't the archivelogs simply =
transferred to the standby server in their entirety? To the best of my =
knowledge, physical standby doesn't do logmining, right?
Or did something change since I last played w/ this?
-Mark
Mark J. Bobak
Oracle DBA
ProQuest Company
Ann Arbor, MI
"Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc"
-----Original Message-----
From: Tanel P=F5der [mailto:tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee]=20
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 11:54 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: [Q] what differtent between logical standby database and =
physical standby DB?
Yep, I understand the physical/logical standbys work the same way you
described here, but I think redo corruptions are detected in physical =
stdby
scenario equally as well as in logical standby, because in both cases =
the
contents of the changes have to be constructed from logfiles, nothing is
applied directly just by copying redoblocks...
Tanel.
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Thu Apr 08 2004 - 11:25:34 CDT
![]() |
![]() |