Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: cost
> My guess would be that this is a deliberate
> heuristic introduced some time around 9
> to avoid nested loop full tablescans when
> the numbers are small.
I wonder could this behaviour be changed with _new_initial_join_orders parameter? (Don't have a chance to test it myself right now)
Tanel.
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Tue Apr 06 2004 - 03:12:58 CDT
![]() |
![]() |