| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: cost
Yep, "bug" is where we're going with it... But we haven't had time yet
to go into detail.
Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
* Nullius in verba *
Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 4/6 Seattle, 5/7 Dallas, 5/18 New Jersey
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Bobak, Mark
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:24 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: cost
Hmm....I should have known, Cary...;-)
I actually had the thought, as I was typing that reply "hmm....*always*, really? Are you sure? Yeah, of course you are, if it's not always choosing the lowest cost, what else could it do....?" Of course, Oracle found a way.....
My first thought, though, would be that this is a bug.....is that where you're going with this? Or is there something more going on? Did 10053 reveal anything interesting?
-Mark
Mark J. Bobak
Oracle DBA
ProQuest Company
Ann Arbor, MI
"Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc"
 |
 |