Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: The Oracle 9.2.0.4 Optimizer - are there problems with it?
Dennis,
Anything is possible. All I'm going by is what the users are telling =
me. =20
They swear that query X ran in 10 minutes 2 weeks ago and now runs in=20
30+. They *swear* that they haven't done anything to change the query =
in
question so it *must* be a database issue. (Anyone else ever heard that
one before?)
But, since I'm not involved in the query development / testing process, =
I
can't be sure about anything and just have to take them at least=20
partially on their word.
As I mentioned previously, I'm not horribly concerned about what I've =
seen=20
to date as each of the queries they've brought to my attention has been=20
horribly inefficient as it is and in serious need of some attention - =
not
all of the ad-hoc query developers have a good understanding of the=20
inter-relationships between the various tables and the query performance
sometimes suffers because of it.
It was a shout in the dark just seeing if anybody was aware of any known deficiencies in the Optimizer in 9.2.0.4. At least that way, I can talk =
to management (who hear of the complaints) and say that I've done my=20 research via Metalink and a community of professional peers, etc.
We update our statistics regularly and I'm more than happy to examine =
the=20
small percentage of queries as they come in and tune them as they =
arrive.
Thanks to all who have commented to date and thanks in advance for any =
other
comments that may be yet to come!
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of DENNIS WILLIAMS
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 2:43 PM
To: 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
Subject: RE: The Oracle 9.2.0.4 Optimizer - are there problems with it?
Stephen
So . . . if a lot of these queries are new, with evolving queries -- =
is
it just possible that it really has nothing to do with the 9.2.0.4 =
patch,
but just coincidentally some queries started showing up after the patch? =
By
the way, adding that patch produced no complaints on my systems.
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.htmlReceived on Fri Apr 02 2004 - 15:59:29 CST
-----------------------------------------------------------------
![]() |
![]() |