Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 9i listener for 8i DB not recommended???
I've just setup another listener on port 1522 just in case. I've got enough
crap trying to convince an app linked against 7.3.3 (Cognos PowerHouse) that
9i is a good thing.
Full safeties on. We don't want this fish swimmin' back to us.
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator rich.jesse_at_quadtechworld.com QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill_at_cybcon.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:58 AM
> To: Oracle-L Freelists
> Subject: Re: 9i listener for 8i DB not recommended???
>
>
> I recently installed a 9i database on an NT server that
> already has 8i on it. The listener for both was setup
> to be 9i, disabling the 8i listener.
>
> It has proved to be somewhat cranky. I've noticed that
> even though the service starts automatically, it sometimes
> will not work correctly unless it is manually started
> via lsnrctl.
>
> Could be a version problem. Or it could just be an NT
> thing, which is good at not starting services correctly anyway.
>
> Jared
>
> On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 05:06, Martin Brown wrote:
> > I had some trouble like this way-back-when 8i was released.
> I found out that
> > 8i listener couldn't service 8.0.5 (8.0.6 was OK). I had to
> set up named
> > listeners and that worked OK in my environment.
> >
> >
> > >From: "Darrell Landrum" <darrell_at_landrum.com>
> > >Reply-To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> > >To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> > >Subject: Re: 9i listener for 8i DB not recommended???
> > >Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:37:27 -0600
> > >
> > >I'm with you, Rich. I don't know where I got it, but I've
> believed it to
> > >be
> > >appropriate if not recommended to run the listener from
> the latest release
> > >you have installed for that release and each one prior
> that you may have on
> > >that system (unless you need a special listener for some
> reason.). We
> > >currently do that. The only problem I've encountered is
> running a 9i
> > >listener from a 64 bit install and using that for an 8i,
> 32 bit instance.
> > >The listener crashed a lot.
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com>
> > >To: "ORACLE-L (E-mail)" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:29 PM
> > >Subject: 9i listener for 8i DB not recommended???
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > While trying to debug a particularly nasty old app, I
> ran across this on
> > >doc
> > > > 77442.1 on MetaLink:
> > > >
> > > > Please note that we don't advise to use a version 9
> listener for a
> > >version
> > > > 8 database
> > > > or a version 10 listener for a version 9 or 8 database
> seen there where
> > >many
> > > > changes
> > > > to the NLS layers between those versions.
> > > >
> > > > As Moe Syzlak says, "WHAAAAAA??!?" This is exactly
> opposite from
> > >everything
> > > > else I've heard, although to be fair, I can't recall
> exactly where I've
> > > > heard that. That and the fact that we haven't been
> using the ORA_NLSxx
> > > > variable since it starting cauing problems when we
> migrated from 7.3 to
> > >8.0,
> > > > which accoring to this doc, is a no-no.
> > > >
> > > > Comments?
> > > > Rich
> > > >
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:45:39 CST
![]() |
![]() |