Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Transportable Tablespace, SCNs and ORA-1555s.
I don't think 2) will succeed.
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Fink [mailto:Daniel.Fink_at_Sun.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 5:38 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Transportable Tablespace, SCNs and ORA-1555s.
This is not in response to an actual problem, it is just the result of a brain that goes off on tangents way to often...
How does a transaction know NOT to build a consistent version of data that has been transported?
Sequence of events
1) Insert records into table1. A Commit SCN of 100000 is
assigned. Due to the size of the insert, there are blocks in the
table that still have an Uncommitted state.
2) Alter tablespace1 (containing table1) to read only and
transport it to database2.
3) Start a query in database2 (with an SCN of 1000) that
accesses the newly transported table1.
Will the query get a 1555?
Yes - It cannot create a read consistent view to SCN 1000 No - It knows that this data came from another database, so it does not attempt to build a read-consistent version
Thoughts on which is correct? I know, I know...build a damn testcase and see for myself. I'm working on it, but I wanted to see what you all thought first.
Daniel
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.htmlput 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
![]() |
![]() |