MTS versus dedicated for resolving a ORA-04031.

From: Grabowy, Chris <chris.grabowy_at_lmco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:02:01 -0500
Message-id: <974B0BC4C9F3BB40B2651F8FC12B7B98A52103@emss04m12.us.lmco.com>

We have upgraded our databases from 8174 to 9203.

We have started encountering ORA-04031's on processes that are using MTS. Once we switch that process to use a dedicated connection then the problem goes away. This problem did not occur when we were using 8174.

For 8174, the shared pool was 100M. Large pool = 0. reserved is 10%. For 9203, the shared pool was doubled to 200M. Large pool = 0. reserved is 10%.

Any thoughts?? Are we killing ourselves by doubling the shared pool?? Does everyone else set their large pool to zero???

TIA.

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

---

Received on Thu Mar 11 2004 - 16:48:58 CST