Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Oracle Performance
Why you changed what I said.
I said
Honestly I don't agree with this, I don't think there is any need to use
rule, in Oracle 9i, CBO works
perfectly with this kind of situation, the problem must be find and fixed.
> Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco wrote:
> <snip>
> > The rule is under same conditions Oracle is always faster, so I think
you
> > are doing
> > something wrong, if you want to get some help you will have to post more
> > information.
> <snip>
> Really? That's an interesting rule. Any metrics to support that
> statement, or does that kinda fall into the same category as the other
> 'myths'?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Bricklen
>
> --
> Bricklen Anderson, Database Administrator
> PresiNET Systems
> http://www.PresiNET.com
> Online Demo: https://www.presinet.com/secure/login
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Thu Mar 11 2004 - 13:38:47 CST
![]() |
![]() |