Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle Performance

RE: Oracle Performance

From: Mike Killough <mwkillough_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:29:17 +0000
Message-ID: <F21E3sQ9CP5mIZpi1dE0003a815@hotmail.com>


I would have to assume that one of these indexes is on COD_IMPORTACION COD_NIVEL_CALIDAD. Please provide the explain plans. I assume that you have also analyzed the SC_FACTURACION table.

>From: "Huascar Espinoza" <hespinoza_at_superele.gov.bo>
>Reply-To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
>CC: "VChoque" <VChoque_at_superele.gov.bo>
>Subject: RE: Oracle Performance
>Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:35:18 -0400
>
>To realize the test, we have the basic following structure (similar on
>Oracle 9i and SQL Server 7.0):
>
>
>
>* Table "SC_FACTURACION" have the following indexes:
>* COD_IMPORTACION
>* NRO_FACTURACION
>* COD_FACTURA_ESTIMADA
>* COD_FACTURA_REFACTURADA
>* COD_MOTIVO_ESTIMACION
>* COD_NIVEL_CALIDAD.
>* Table "GE_HISTORICO_IMPORTACION" has 30 registers.
>* Table "SC_FACTURACION" has 1,885,618 registers.
>
>On 'SC_FACTURACION' we execute the following SQL sentences:
>
>1. SELECT COUNT(NRO_FACTURACION) FROM SC_FACTURACION WHERE COD_IMPORTACION
>= '14' AND COD_NIVEL_CALIDAD = '1'
>2. SELECT MAX(NRO_FACTURACION) FROM SC_FACTURACION WHERE COD_IMPORTACION =
>'14' AND COD_NIVEL_CALIDAD = '1'
>3. SELECT MIN(NRO_FACTURACION) FROM SC_FACTURACION WHERE COD_IMPORTACION =
>'14' AND COD_NIVEL_CALIDAD = '1'
>
>The results are:
>
>
>Sentence
>Performance ORACLE 9i
>Performance MS SQL Server 7.0
>
>1
>2 minutes
>20 secs.
>
>2
>2 minutes
>1 sec.
>
>3
>50 secs.
>1 secs.
>
>The servers are the followins features:
>
>ORACLE 9i Server
>
>Processor
>Intel Pentium IV - 2.4 GHz
>
>RAM Memory
>512 MB
>
>S SQL Server 7.0 Server
>
>Processor
>Intel Celeron 2.4 GHz
>
>RAM Memory
>380 MB
>
>
>Please let me know, why the performance of Oracle is so low.
>
>Thank you!
>
>Huáscar Espinoza
>
>
>-----Mensaje original-----
>De: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] En
>nombre de DENNIS WILLIAMS
>Enviado el: Jueves 11 de Marzo de 2004 9:16
>Para: 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
>Asunto: RE: Oracle Performance
>
>Huascar
> Normal? No. In order to help diagnose your situation, please post
>more
>details. Like your query, the sizes of your tables, etc. Have you analyzed
>the tables in Oracle?
>
>
>
>Dennis Williams
>DBA
>Lifetouch, Inc.
>dwilliams_at_lifetouch.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
>[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On
>Behalf Of Huascar Espinoza
>Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:04 AM
>To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>Subject: Oracle Performance
>
>
>
>¿Is it normal that a SQL sentence: MAX or MIN, execute over 1.5 minutes on
>Oracle 9i, and in 1 sec. on SQL Server 7.0 (2 millions of registers), using
>equals data structures and servers? ¿Why occur this situation?
>
>
>
>Thank you,
>
>
>
>Huascar Espinoza
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
>put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
>--
>Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
>FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
>-----------------------------------------------------------------



One-click access to Hotmail from any Web page – download MSN Toolbar now! http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu Mar 11 2004 - 09:18:11 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US