Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: MetaLink
Peter and I make two "NO" votes. How many searches do the rest of you
actually have to save? Is saving searches really that useful ? I usually
look something up and try to fix it. If I think I may need to save
something, I usually bookmark it.
And the performance does suck.
>From: Peter.McLarty_at_mincom.com
>Reply-To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>To: "Oracle-L List" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
>Subject: RE: MetaLink
>Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:41:31 +1000
>
>Seems someone in Oracle needs to learn web design, removing the quick
>search is bad and the performance is woeful, oh and the view saved
>searches button is in the wrong place it should be away from the submit
>button and should be somewhere on the left, but then again if the guys
>that built the site aren't from western countries then perhaps it all
>seems normal to them
>
>Cheer
>
>
>--
>=================================================
>Peter McLarty E-mail: Peter.Mclarty_at_mincom.com
>Technical Consultant WWW: http://www.mincom.com
>APAC Technical Services Phone: +61 (0)7 3303 3461
>Brisbane, Australia Mobile: +61 (0)402 094 238
> Facsimile: +61 (0)7 3303 3048
>=================================================
>"Whatever you can do or dream you can, begin it.
>Boldness has genius, power and magic in it, begin it now."
>Goethe 1749 -1832
>=================================================
>Mincom "The People, The Experience, The Vision"
>
>=================================================
>
>This transmission is for the intended addressee only and is confidential
>information. If you have received this transmission in error, please
>delete it and notify the sender. The contents of this e-mail are the
>opinion of the writer only and are not endorsed by the Mincom Group of
>companies unless expressly stated otherwise.
>
>
>
>ml-errors_at_fatcity.com wrote on 09/03/2004 12:04:25 AM:
>
> > Okay, it finally loaded. To give Oracle the beneft of the doubt,
> > I'm hoping performance is related to "opening day" traffic. The
> > extra click for a search is counter-productive for me - I can't just
> > click on a boomark, enter my userID/password and start my search
> > anymore. Now I have to wait for the page to load, click the search
> > button and then enter my search criteria.
> >
> > I will say that the advanced search features are *nice* to have, but
> > I want the base search functionality to load fast and be the first
> > thing I see. Advanced searches should be an option.
> >
> > I hope Oracle rethinks their approach.
> >
> > Matt
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ml-errors_at_fatcity.com [mailto:ml-errors_at_fatcity.com] On Behalf Of
> > Oldham, Matthew
> > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 9:49 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ODTUG-L
> > Subject: RE: MetaLink
>
> > I'd comment on the new version but I am still waiting on the page to
>load...
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ml-errors_at_fatcity.com [mailto:ml-errors_at_fatcity.com] On Behalf Of
> > Dean Harris
> > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 9:19 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ODTUG-L
> > Subject: MetaLink
>
> > Just curious. Anyone else dislike the changes to MetaLink made this
> > weekend. Seems like a big step backwards at this point. Plus it's
> > painfully slow right now. Where's my quick text field. Search
> > results don't give any match percentages. Ugh!!!
> >
> > Felt good to let that out. :)
> >
>
> > - Dean Harris
> >
> > Fun Fact:
> > The American dollar traded for 1500 German marks in 1922. By the
> > end of 1923 the same dollar was worth 4.2 trillion German marks.
> >
> > This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments
> > transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and
> > privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the
> > individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed. If you are
> > the intended recipient, further disclosures are prohibited without
> > proper authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> > disclosure, copying, printing, or use of this information is
> > strictly prohibited and possibly a violation of federal or state law
> > and regulations. If you have received this information in error,
> > please notify Baylor Health Care System immediately at
> > 1-866-402-1661 or via e-mail at privacy_at_baylorhealth.edu. Baylor
> > Health Care System, its subsidiaries, and affiliates hereby claim
> > all applicable privileges related to this information.
>
> >
> > This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments
> > transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and
> > privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the
> > individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed. If you are
> > the intended recipient, further disclosures are prohibited without
> > proper authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> > disclosure, copying, printing, or use of this information is
> > strictly prohibited and possibly a violation of federal or state law
> > and regulations. If you have received this information in error,
> > please notify Baylor Health Care System immediately at
> > 1-866-402-1661 or via e-mail at privacy_at_baylorhealth.edu. Baylor
> > Health Care System, its subsidiaries, and affiliates hereby claim
> > all applicable privileges related to this information.
>
>
>--
>This transmission is for the intended addressee only and is confidential
>information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
>the sender and delete the transmission. The contents of this e-mail are the
>opinion of the writer only and are not endorsed by the Mincom Group of
>companies unless expressly stated otherwise.
>
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Mon Mar 08 2004 - 11:03:29 CST
![]() |
![]() |