Re: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:47:36 -0000
Message-ID: <015601c40086$dea2b7c0$6702a8c0@Primary>

Ian,

Do you have any mechanism for correcting the query time; or is it a random number ?

Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html

March 2004 Hotsos Symposium - The Burden of Proof Dynamic Sampling - an investigation
March 2004 Charlotte OUG (www.cltoug.org) CBO Tutorial April 2004 Iceland
June 2004 UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar

Original Message ----- From: "MacGregor, Ian A." <ian_at_SLAC.Stanford.EDU>

> The ORA-01555 error indicates you need to p the value of the
UNDO_RETENTION parameter. You MAY also need to increase the UNDO tablespace size. The error does not report the "Query Duration" accurately.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guang Mei [mailto:gmei_at_incyte.com]
>
> ORA-01555 caused by SQL statement below (Query Duration=199335 sec, SCN:
> 0x0000.01db218e):

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:44:51 CST