Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: updating singly sys packages
thanks but I decided not to do, the rason was to check improvements
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamadagni, Rajendra" <Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com>
To: "Freeman Robert - IL" <FREEMANR_at_tusc.com>; <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: updating singly sys packages
Not sure what specific problems you are pointing to, but for more than year we are running stable on 9202 (about 8 production RAC databases) ... however recently migrated couple of RAC instances to 9204 just for a but related to AQ (enqueue in once instance is visible in other instances only after 5 minutes and 10 (or 8) seconds.)
My question to Juan is why utl_file ...
Raj
-----Original Message-----
From: Freeman Robert - IL [mailto:FREEMANR_at_tusc.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 4:11 PM
To: Jamadagni, Rajendra; 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org '
Subject: RE: updating singly sys packages
9204 has hoards of bug fixes that are simply a requirement.... 9203 was fairly stable but 9201 and 9202, if you are on those versions, you pretty much MUST upgrade ASAP. Fail to do so an you are taking your own databases life into your own hands.
Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamadagni, Rajendra
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Sent: 2/27/2004 3:07 PM
Subject: RE: updating singly sys packages
Why are you concentrating on utl_file ... what is in 9204 that is not in earlier versions ??
innocent minds want to know.
Raj
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.htmlput 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
![]() |
![]() |