RE: AUTOSYS performance issues

From: Thomas Jeff <jeff.thomas_at_thomson.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:53:43 -0500
Message-ID: <358728A276824E419580403633AABFD001B7B6AE@INDYSMAIL03.am.thmulti.com>

Thanks for that info, as we are planning to upgrade to 9.2.0.4 (we are on 9.2.0.2) in the near
future. =20

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Mladen Gogala Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:50 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: AUTOSYS performance issues

On 02/20/2004 08:31:39 AM, Thomas Jeff wrote:
> Niall,

>=20

> I agree with avoiding FORCE, it's a solution of the last resort, too=20
> many side effects.

On 9.2.0.4, it works perfecly well, without those pesky ora-600. As any new feature, it needed to mature a bit to be useful.

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Fri Feb 20 2004 - 07:53:43 CST