Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: UTL_FILE performance
Thanks to all that replied.=20
I have (re)learned a couple of things.=20
1. You don't need to guess, Oracle will tell you.=20 2. Don't assume that it is the feature that s new to you that is the proble= m.=20
call count cpu elapsed disk query current =
rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----=
0
Execute 1 42.03 124.20 34 1888020 0 =
1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 =
0
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----=
1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 76 =20
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Wait=ed
call count cpu elapsed disk query current =
rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----=
0
Execute 626497 70.38 117.67 15 5794 1928518 6=
26497
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 =
0
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----=
600k single row inserts, hmm maybe not such a good decision. Commenting out=
the insert statement results in an elapsed time of 20secs. :(=20
=20
Although we are on 9.2, I intended to share the script with the user group = for the product that creates these logs and 8i is still a supported platfor= m for this app - thus external tables are out, and I never can figure out s=qlloader syntax.=20
=20
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wed Feb 18 2004 - 04:33:48 CST
![]() |
![]() |