Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle 10g for Windows
Comments interspersed
> * No decent scheduler. Yes there is 'at'. Like I said...
Scheduled tasks
=20
> * Installing Perl on win32 with all needed modules has
> become a monumental pain in the rear.
Fair comment
>=20
I'd say that wordpad was semi-decent and the vs.net ide was superb(but cost= ly).=20
> * Command line utilities. You think unix/linux is arcane?
I *think* that it depends on what you are familiar with. I'd also not use t= he command shell for scripting but the windows scripting host.=20
>=20
:(=20
> * The fact that there are still drive letters.
I can't get too excited about drive letters v mount points, but in windows2= 000 upwards you do have a choice.=20
> * That MS has *finally* got around to offering unix like=20
> utilities, but
> wants $100 for them, on top of the money you've already paid=20
> for the OS.
:(=20
> * That it took until Win23k for MS to design the system to allow
> different versions of apps to have different versions of DLL's.
> Lesse, we've been doing this on unix for 30 years or so?
That must be why the linux install guides are so easy and never include ref= erences to the right glibc libraries :(=20
>=20
> * The stupid Oracle home selector that is strictly a GUI.
I've always ignored it.=20
> Mind you now, Oracle runs just fine on win32. It's maintaining it and
> working with the environment that is so annoying, and made difficult
> where it shouldn't be.
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission
+44 117 975 7805=20
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Mon Feb 16 2004 - 09:34:01 CST
![]() |
![]() |