Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: shot in the dark applications performance problem....
Did you check out the Locks scenario?
Check out the Network switches and see if there are collisions?
Whats baffaling is how can the delay be exactly 1 min or 2 min something is seriously wron?See the Locking arch ?I am quite sure something is goofy there.
Deep
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Stephens <ChrisStephens_at_affina.com>
To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 9:03 PM
Subject: shot in the dark applications performance problem....
> Let me preface all of this by stating that I realize there is very little
> chance of a resolution to this from the explanation I'm about to
give...but
> it thought I'd try and describe the problem here and see if it sparks any
> suggestions....
>
>
> The company I work for has outsourced an applications implementation.
> Everything has been running fine. Currently we run 2 call center apps out
> of the thing. This past weekend the company changed our architecture from
a
> 1-tier system to a 2-tier system. (not sure if that's standard apps
> architectures or not) When the reps began taking calls after that change,
> performance slowed to a halt. They have now been taking phone calls on
> paper for 5 days now. The company has reverted back to the 1-tier
> architecture but the performance problem still exists. The people testing
> the system describe the problem as follows:
>
> ==
>
> ...one person running the call flows=>performance is fine.
>
>
>
> ...several persons running the call flows=>EXACTLY 1 minute delays between
> screens.
>
>
>
> ...several more persons running the call flows=>EXACTLY 2 minute delays
> between screens.
>
>
>
> ...several more persons running the call flows=>EXACTLY 3 minute delays
> between screens. (weird)
>
>
>
> ==
>
> apparently there is a script that can be run that just goes through the
> screens without running ANY of the database code and the wait behavior is
> the same. ????
>
>
>
> I checked the machines involved from top and they are barely being worked.
>
>
>
> I checked the waits in the database and the largest event time is from
> 'sqlnet message from client'.
>
>
>
> The company restored the system to a previous incarnation and it worked
just
> fine.
>
>
>
> Something is very very wrong.
>
>
>
> ....and thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Sorry for the vagueness.
>
>
>
> ...questions welcomed.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any info!!!!
>
>
>
> chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Sat Feb 14 2004 - 01:19:10 CST
![]() |
![]() |