Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: how does oracle manage hash maps?
> Traditional hashing uses an array for the hash,
> then a linked list for the collisions.
I believe this is exactly what Oracle does when building the hash table (build table) for a hash join. Bear in mind that all the columns from the hashed data set (select columns and join columns) are copied into the hash table, so any references to the cache buffer are a distraction.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
The educated person is not the person
who can answer the questions, but the
person who can question the answers -- T. Schick Jr
Next public appearances:
March 2004 Hotsos Symposium - The Burden of Proof
March 2004 Charlotte NC OUG - CBO Tutorial
April 2004 Iceland
One-day tutorials:
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html
Three-day seminar:
see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
____UK___February
____UK___June
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
When Oracle performs a hash-join it first creates a hashmap. This hash map is placed in the PGA. Now, Oracle uses linked lists to manage the buffer cache. Traditional hashing uses an array for the hash, then a linked list for the collisions. How does Oracle manage this?
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Feb 13 2004 - 03:38:40 CST
![]() |
![]() |