RE: RE: LMT ASSM & next extent

From: Jamadagni, Rajendra <Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:35:31 -0500
Message-ID: <A186CBDC8B1D61438BC50F1A77E91F73057C1938@xchgbrsm1.corp.espn.pvt>

We are a location where our SAs don't like autoextend ... even DBAs = don't want autoextend.

Raj
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=

---

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 8:28 AM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: RE: LMT ASSM & next extent

is there a practical need to do that? I typically just turn autoextend = on for all my files and have code that monitors the bytes in all my = segments in a tablespace vs. the size of the datafile and I get an email = if its close to filling up or if the datafile extends.=20

is there a need for a more comprehensive approach?=20

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

---

Received on Wed Feb 11 2004 - 07:35:31 CST