Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Anywy to accurately predict time for long running queries?
I like that.
Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
* Nullius in verba *
Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 2/24 San Diego, 3/23 Park City, 4/6 Seattle - SQL Optimization 101: 2/16 Dallas - Hotsos Symposium 2004: March 7-10 Dallas - Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Mladen Gogala
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:07 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Anywy to accurately predict time for long running queries?
On 02/10/2004 12:01:30 PM, Cary Millsap wrote:
> If you're *writing* the app yourself, then consider using the Oracle
> long-ops stuff. I can't remember how to access it (and my network
> connection is too slow to look it up right now). For example, if you
One of the dirty tricks is to set up a profile with limited LOGICAL_READS_PER_CALL to, say, 1000 or 1500 and then tune whichever statement fails. Most of modern unix systems can easily execute 1500 LIO's in a second. Big boxes with separate IO buses and "smart I/O" architectures can do many, many LIO's more. I don't know how many LIO requests/sec can IBM "big iron" perform.
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Tue Feb 10 2004 - 13:27:52 CST
![]() |
![]() |