Re: Shared Server vs. Connection Pooling

From: Tim Gorman <tim_at_sagelogix.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 07:51:22 -0700
Message-ID: <BC4CEC7A.FEA1%tim@sagelogix.com>

When the application is busy, was written in CGI scripts, and nobody will update it to use connection pooling.

Shared server is a last resort to accommodate poorly-built applications.

on 2/9/04 6:10 AM, ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net at ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net wrote:

> My shop is using connection pooling. It seems like the trend is towards middle
> tier connection pooling and away from Shared Server. What do you think? Anyone
> know any cases where Shared Server is a superior option to middle tier
> connection pooling(other than the reduction in cost)?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Mon Feb 09 2004 - 08:51:22 CST