RE: PL/SQL vs Java speed in 10g

From: Jamadagni, Rajendra <Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 12:43:27 -0500
Message-ID: <A186CBDC8B1D61438BC50F1A77E91F73057C18EC@xchgbrsm1.corp.espn.pvt>

Probably the same person also mentioned that 'Oracle Forms is dead' too = ...

Raj

-------------------------------------------------------------------------=

---

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Jared Still Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 12:43 PM To: Oracle-L Freelists
Subject: Re: PL/SQL vs Java speed in 10g

It seemed a ludicrous statement the first time I heard it.

I don't even pay attention to it anymore.

Jared

On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 22:40, Tim Gorman wrote:
> Why would Oracle claim that PL/SQL is dead when all Java stored =
procedures
> have to be encapsulated in PL/SQL wrappers?
>=20
>=20

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Sun Feb 08 2004 - 11:43:27 CST