Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: statspack wait events

RE: statspack wait events

From: Raghu Kota (WBTQ) <RKota_at_WestonBakeries.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:19:37 -0500
Message-ID: <1E43D520906CD711A75800034772B0AB2BB77A@wbtqmsx1.westonfoods.net>


Excellent answer Cary, Thank you so much! I will do further = investigation what's happening in my system. I got more inspired by = reading some of recent discussions by members, you and Tim(Capacity = Planner from OEM VS Statspack). Thanks KL.

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Cary Millsap Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 2:51 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: statspack wait events

Raghu,

This kind of situation is what I meant by my "worse than useless" posts last week... What you're showing *may* be an indication that you have some SQL that would benefit from a reduction in OS read calls. However, it is entirely possible that you also might *not* benefit from such a reduction. If that's your situation, then you have an extra problem now: getting the idea that you "have an I/O bottleneck" out of your head. If your system does not have an I/O problem (and you can't tell by looking at what you've shown here), then getting the wrong idea out of your head is going to be an extra project step. In my experience, it's a project step that sometimes takes MONTHS to execute. (Seeing this kind of thing so frequently is what inspires great passion within me about this subject.)

Your next step is to find some user action that's running for longer than the business needs it to run. Find out why that program is taking so long. Fix the program by reducing its demand for the thing it spends the most time using. Once you've done that, if the program still isn't fast enough for the business, then reduce the demand that its competitors are generating for the resource your program is spending most of its time consuming. Check Chapter 1 of "Optimizing Oracle Performance" online (free) at
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/optoraclep/index.html.=20

Somebody will surely recommend that you consult listing of "top SQL" in the Statspack report you're looking at. By doing this, you'll probably find something to work on. However, Statspack has no idea how to sort your system's SQL statement by business priority, so it's possible that the guidance you'll receive from this Statspack report won't help you at all.

Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
* Nullius in verba *

Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 2/24 San Diego, 3/23 Park City, 4/6 Seattle


Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:19:37 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US