Re: OFA - dump destinations

From: <Jared.Still_at_radisys.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:02:28 -0800
Message-ID: <OF5EAD89D1.64B6B5E5-ON88256E2F.0078D9D7-88256E2F.00790193@radisys.com>

Speaking off the cuff, I can't think of a technical reason. I wouldn't do it, as I like to keep the users trace files separate from the alert log and system trace files.

Setting _trace_files_public may raise some issues when udump and bdump point to the same directory, though I have not tried it.

How about cdump? Why not put them there as well?

Jared

Mark Moynahan <Mark.Moynahan_at_apollogrp.edu> Sent by: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
02/03/2004 01:51 PM
Please respond to oracle-l

        To:     "'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        OFA - dump destinations

We are currently working installing a 9i db on a new box. The senior dba wants to put all trace files into one directory on $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/log. I've suggested that this is not the best practice prescribed by OFA. Does anyone see any major issues with keeping all trace files in one directory?

Thanks,

Mark

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

Received on Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:02:28 CST