Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: pga_aggregate_target and a memory leak
I have been asking questions on this list recently about a
Possible similar problem recently with pl/sql tables.
This was on hpux 11.11 with oracle 9.2.0.4
I still haven't found the answer completely but pat=0 and was_pol = manual
Is a workaround that seems to be ok. I have a lack of time
For further testing but will try do do so and report some more.
Regards,
Jeroen
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Stephane Faroult [mailto:sfaroult_at_oriole.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 20 januari 2004 20:59
Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Onderwerp: Re: pga_aggregate_target and a memory leak
ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net wrote:
>
> One of our production DBAs does not want to use pga_aggregate_target on a
9.2.0.3 instance due to a possible memory leak. The only note on memory
leaks and pga_aggregate_target I can find on metalink is: 334427.995
>
> doesnt seem to apply to pga_aggregate_target. We are on sun solaris. Dont
know version offhand.
>
> he is under the impression that if we patch to 9.2.0.4 this goes away. not
sure about that either...
>
Be careful with pga_aggregate_target. I have very recently seen a case (Solaris + 9.2 but I cant't tell you exactly which patch level - probably the most recent) where two (by the way atrocious) queries generated by a DSS tool were responding very differently - and in a way that differences in the queries couldn't explain. From an Oracle standpoint, stats were roughly the same. Tracing proved that we were waiting for CPU, and truss that a call to mmap() was the culprit. Why, no idea. We first switched it (pga_thing) off, no more slow call to mmap(). However, it was still slow because we hadn't checked sort_area_size which was ridiculously small. We set sort_area_size to 10M, still with pga_aggregate_target unset, and once again the same very slow calls to mmap(). Memory misalignment? Anything else? Not much time to enquire but it looks like a mine field.
-- Regards, Stephane Faroult Oriole Software -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Stephane Faroult INET: sfaroult_at_oriole.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jeroen van Sluisdam INET: jeroen.van.sluisdam_at_vrijuit.nl Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Tue Jan 20 2004 - 15:44:33 CST
![]() |
![]() |