Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Should we stop analyzing?
Note in-line.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
The educated person is not the person
who can answer the questions, but the
person who can question the answers -- T. Schick Jr
Next public appearance2:
March 2004 Hotsos Symposium - Keynote
March 2004 Charlotte NC - OUG Tutorial
April 2004 Iceland
One-day tutorials:
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html
Three-day seminar:
see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
____UK___February
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > Wouldn't it be nice if dbms_stats could do an "incremental"
refresh,
> > tracking ONLY stats changes that might make a difference to execution
plan:
>
>
> I'd settle for a flag I could turn on and off, saying:
> "do/do not change stats for this object".
> I know which of them need to be analyzed and which don't.
> Better than Oracle will ever, deltas or no deltas,
> workload managers or not.
>
Available in Oracle 10g - "lock stats".
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jonathan Lewis INET: jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Fri Jan 09 2004 - 08:04:26 CST
![]() |
![]() |