Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: sql trace - forward attribution

RE: sql trace - forward attribution

From: Jamadagni, Rajendra <Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 09:14:26 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005DBDBE.20040106091426@fatcity.com>


you may not be seeing parse etc entries for cursor #0 merely because maybe by design, cursor#0 gets invoked before trace gets activated. This way, you will never get cursor #0 info.

You can tell, I am guessing but to get similar experience, start trace in an already active session and you'll see. Raj



Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:00 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Thanks to Anjo, Cary, Tanel, and everybody who provided feedback back channel.

Just to rule out the possibility of a collection error
(somebody suggested that cursor #0 is simply not
captured) I bounced the DB today, enabled a DB-wide trace ... and as expected

grep -i "cursor #0" *

returned nothing, while "wait #0" gives plenty. So it is not a trace activation/termination error.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jamadagni, Rajendra
  INET: Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L

(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Tue Jan 06 2004 - 11:14:26 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US