RE: RE: orbitz fiasco

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:30:25 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005D749A.20031120123025@fatcity.com>

OK, that's what I get for not R'ing all TFMs before opening my mouth -- is "active-active" Oracle RAC-based failover as opposed to OS-based failover?

Rich

Rich Jesse                           System/Database Administrator
rjesse_at_qtiworld.com                  Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:05 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

We have been production on 9202 for a while and testing 9204. Our experience is good ... we run active-active.

Raj
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--

Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Thu Nov 20 2003 - 14:30:25 CST