Re: RE: orbitz fiasco

> RE: orbitz fiasco
>
> <On my Soapbox>
> <My expensive free advice>
> RAC *can* provide a higher level of availability. It isn't the
> complete answer, but offers a level of improvement. But one needs to
> consider the complete infrastructure for high availability(Web
> servers, app servers, db servers, storage, fiber switches, SAN,
> QFE's, HBA's,etc,etc)

I agree with you, that's why I wrote "REAL high availability" in my previous post.

Btw, my colleague was working on a 9.0.1.3 RAC project where hang of one node caused hang of all other ones. Now that's high availability ;)

Tanel.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Tanel Poder
  INET: tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).