Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Re: _wait_for_sync , dirty buffer flushing and direct reads in parallel
I think my understanding was wrong. _wait_for_sync actually only changes the
behavior of foreground processes. When set to false, they don't wait for LGWR
to write redo records to disk; instead they continue to do their work as if log
file sync already finished. It *does not* change any behavior of LGWR,
notification or not. Correct me if I'm wrong again.
I'm still interested in Tanel's benchmark, though. Only that is scientific.
Yong Huang
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Yong Huang INET: yong321_at_yahoo.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Thu Nov 20 2003 - 09:10:00 CST
![]() |
![]() |