Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Table partitioning Oracle 9.2
Hi!
No, data blocks below partitions high-high water mark can never be used for
another segment.
Unformatted blocks above (high)-high water mark can be used for another
segment only when you trim the extent(s) using alter table deallocate unused
(but this feature is useful only if you have lots of unformatted space in
your segment for some reason).
So, if your business allow this table to be offline for a while, I'd recommend the following approach after you've archived your old data (some features here require 9i and syntax is written from memory, might have small errors in it):
You can use nologging in evey operation mentioned above (with the exception of "update global indexes" in step 3). Of course in case of nologging operations, your backup strategy has to be "aware" of them.
So, instead of generating lots of redo and undo+redo due huge deletes and index maintenance you just take this small amount of rows you need, insert them into a new segment using direct path and nologging (very little undo and redo), and then just exchange the segments between your "old" and "new" tables.
Cheers,
Tanel.
> --=_MAILER_ATTACH_BOUNDARY1_2003103151337181540383426
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
>
> RDBMS Version: 9.2.0.1.0
> Operating System and Version: Solaris 8
> Error Number (if applicable):
> Product (i.e. SQL*Loader, Import, etc.): Partitioned Table
> Product Version: 9.2.0.1.0
>
> Table partitioning
>
> Hi,
>
> I've a query reg. space usage in context of partitioned tables.
>
> I've a table with 12 partitions P_1 ... P_12. Until now data
> got populated in P_1 upto P_6 and future data will come in P_7 etc.
> If i delete some huge amount of data from P_1 (after archiving it)
> will that freed space be used by future inserts (which happens in
subsequent partitions like P_7 etc).
> Unfortunately, we can't delete all data in partition. We have to keep some
data which account say 5% of total data. ie, we're deleting 95% of data from
a partition. So, will this freed blocks be put to free list and used by
future inserts?
> Data is partitioned by date. So, my query is whether Oracle will put
future data (which belongs to partition P_7 etc.) in space earlier used by
P_1.
>
> Any help from members is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Vikas
>
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at
http://email.indiatimes.com
> Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com
> Bid for Air Tickets on Air Sahara Flights. For Best Deals, log on to
http://airsahara.indiatimes.com and Bid Now !
>
> --=_MAILER_ATTACH_BOUNDARY1_2003103151337181540383426
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
>
> <P><STRONG></STRONG> </P>
> <P><STRONG>RDBMS Version</STRONG>: 9.2.0.1.0<BR><B>Operating System and
Version</B>: Solaris 8<BR><B>Error Number (if applicable)</B>:
<BR><B>Product (i.e. SQL*Loader, Import, etc.)</B>: Partitioned
Table<BR><B>Product Version</B>: 9.2.0.1.0<BR><BR>Table
partitioning<BR><BR>Hi, <BR><BR>I've a query reg. space usage in context of
partitioned tables. <BR><BR>I've a table with 12 partitions P_1 ... P_12.
Until now data <BR>got populated in P_1 upto P_6 and future data will come
in P_7 etc. <BR>If i delete some huge amount of data from P_1 (after
archiving it) <BR>will that freed space be used by future inserts (which
happens in subsequent partitions like P_7 etc). <BR>Unfortunately, we can't
delete all data in partition. We have to keep some data which account say 5%
of total data. ie, we're deleting 95% of data from a partition. So, will
this freed blocks be put to free list and used by future inserts? <BR>Data
is partitioned by date. So, my query is whether Oracle will put fu!
> tu!
> re data (which belongs to partition P_7 etc.) in space earlier used by
P_1.<BR><BR>Any help from members is appreciated. <BR><BR>Thanks, <BR>Vikas
<BR></P>
> <hr><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from
Indiatimes at </font><a href="http://email.indiatimes.com"><font
face="Arial" size="2">http://email.indiatimes.com</a></b><br>Buy The Best In
<b>BOOKS</b> at <A
href="http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com">http://www.bestsellers.indiatim
es.com</A><br>Bid for <b>Air Tickets</b> on Air Sahara Flights. For Best
Deals, log on to <a
href="http://airsahara.indiatimes.com">http://airsahara.indiatimes.com</a>
and Bid Now !</font>
>
> --=_MAILER_ATTACH_BOUNDARY1_2003103151337181540383426--
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author: Vikas S
> INET: vikas_soolapani_at_indiatimes.com
>
> Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Tanel Poder INET: tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Sun Nov 02 2003 - 18:34:25 CST
![]() |
![]() |