Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Solved - RE: UTL_RAW and slowness
Read if you are interested ...
Finally I got some time and luckily the largest message to use with dbms_profiler. And the results shocked me .... dbms_profiler showed me that instead of utl_raw, substr() was the culprit. Remember my operation is character by character.
After some long thinking and evaluating different techniques, I finally decided that the delay was due to the fact that substr() operation was way too slow to be included in my processing. As for alternatives, only thing I could think was parallel processing and pipelined came to my mind ...
So, I implemented a pipelined function that does nothing, but takes a CLOB and returns me 1K chunks (using dbms_lob.read()) of it. I do this operation in a cursor loop, so by the time I process 1k characters, next 1k is waiting at the doorstep. Thus by parallelising the delay, I finally resolved the problem.
Thanks you all for your help, suggestion and hints which really got me thinking. Plus having 9202 helped too otherwise it would have been difficult (without pipelined function). Raj
**************************************************************************************4
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services ---------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Mon Oct 27 2003 - 15:29:33 CST