Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Cache a table
Did anyone try to benchmark the touch count based algorithm against
the old LRU list? LRU list had advantage of being intuitive, while
touch count algorithm is depending on many parameters for which I
don't exactly understand the impact. LRU list parameters were
essentially defining the desired length of the free buffers list,
while the touch count parameters are all undocumented and are
signifying the size of touch pool, the interval in which block has to
be touched if the touch count is to increase, the required touch count
to be moved to the hot pool and alike. Is it more efficient then the
previous easy and understandable LRU lists or not? Touch counts are
visible as TCH in X$BH. I still have no clue what "TIM" is.
On 10/21/2003 04:39:33 PM, Wolfgang Breitling wrote:
> Before Oracle 8 and the new touch count algorithm the cache attribute > made sense. If a small, frequently used table was read by a full > scan, it would have been put at the end of the LRU chain eligible to > be aged out immediately, quite possibly by itself if it consisted of > more than ~ db_file_multiblock_read_count blocks, i.e. the 2nd or 3rd > full scan read would already override the previously read blocks. > Marking the table as CACHEd prevented that. > > At 01:09 PM 10/21/2003, you wrote:
> > Wolfgang Breitling > Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA > Centrex Consulting Corporation > http://www.centrexcc.com > >-- > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net >-- > Author: Wolfgang Breitling > INET: breitliw_at_centrexcc.com > > Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com > San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message > to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Mladen Gogala
Note:
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Wang Trading LLC and any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity.
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Mladen Gogala INET: mladen_at_wangtrading.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Tue Oct 21 2003 - 16:14:28 CDT