Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Cary's Book - new topic
Good point. I suppose this gets into the realm of "perceived response
time". Some applications break long transactions into several user
interactions to hide the real response time. The application still makes
its SLA defined as "90% of transactions complete in < 3 seconds" while the
real transaction takes a lot longer. However, the user is kept busy and you
get into that perception thing. I know that if I see a traffic jam, I look
for ways to detour around it. Even it I don't save any time (there is no
way of telling really), I have at least the impression that I'm doing
something, that I'm in charge, rather sitting passively in the jam crawling
along, waiting for something the clear up.
At 12:39 PM 10/7/2003, you wrote:
>Also, if we are to really address the business case as you suggest then
>the definition should also include the quality of the response. If the
>response is quick but incomplete and the user has to ask 10 questions to
>get at the one real answer he's after then what good is a fast response
>time?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:09 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Wolfgang Breitling INET: breitliw_at_centrexcc.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Tue Oct 07 2003 - 13:59:55 CDT
![]() |
![]() |