RE: locally managed autoallocate (was: Separate Indexes and Data)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse, Rich
> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:49 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: locally managed autoallocate (was: Separate Indexes and
> Data)
>
> Theoritically, perhaps, but what if an existing table needs
> to auto-extend
> at 1M and all that's left in the table is 16 (or whatever)

(blush) Obviously, that's supposed to say "left in the tableSPACE".

> 64K chunks. I
> still maintain that system-managed tablespaces are barely
> better than DMTs
> -- fragmentation is still potentially a problem and needs to
> be monitored.
>
> On the flip-side, LMT segments need to be watched too in case they are
> growing beyond the design of the TS (e.g. more than 1024 or
> how ever many
> extents). I'd much rather deal with the latter because it's much less
> likely to happen unexpectedly in our environment.
>
> Rich

Rich

Rich Jesse                           System/Database Administrator
rjesse_at_qtiworld.com                  Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).