Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Triggers - How expensive when set on heavily loaded tables ?
CASE - If Only 1 record is found in TABLE_1 (on the average) for 8 records INSERTED into TRAN_TBL
Qs Is the Overhead of Checking the condition by the trigger also a significant portion OTHER than the actual execution by the trigger of INSERT into TABLE_2 on finding a match in TABLE_1? Any percentage proportion ratios of Checking Overhead TO execution ( INSERT ) overhead ?
Any Docs , Links on such ?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:42 AM
To: 'oracledba_at_lazydba.com'; 'ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com'
Qs 1) Whenever an Account ID is transacted - INSERT occurs into a table TRAN_TBL as part of the transaction , Additionally the Account ID is checked for existence in another table say TABLE_1 . If found , a record is inserted into yet another table say TABLE_2 .
Qs. Operations involving TABLE_1 & TABLE_2 if managed using triggers , How expensive in CPU & performance will it be ?
NOTE - TRAN_TBL undergoes very large volumes of Concurrent OLTP INSERT transaction .
Qs 2) If an alert is to be raised on addition of a new record to TABLE_2 :-
a) Can trigger be used ?
b) Should a cron job running every 5 min. look at TABLE_2 & based on the time criteria generates the alert ?
Thanks
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: VIVEK_SHARMA
INET: VIVEK_SHARMA_at_infosys.com
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services ---------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Wed Jul 30 2003 - 03:24:29 CDT
![]() |
![]() |