Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Who Says Oracle does not listen

RE: Who Says Oracle does not listen

From: Igor Neyman <ineyman_at_perceptron.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 08:38:09 -0400
Message-Id: <25988.338876@fatcity.com>


Doing it my way just seems to be "cleaner": why forcing exception, when it could be avoided?

Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
ineyman_at_perceptron.com

-----Original Message-----

From: ml-errors_at_fatcity.com [mailto:ml-errors_at_fatcity.com] On Behalf Of Alex Feinstein
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:44 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Who Says Oracle does not listen

RE: Who Says Oracle does not listenAgree. One can improve EXCEPTION section to ignore only relevant errors.

Alex.

That's not good enough.
I don't want to discard ANY exception.
When dropping table, I don't want to see error messages only if there is nothing to drop. While if let's say there is a problem with privileges, it
will go unnoticed.
Or, when adding a table, it's fine not be getting an error, if table already
exists. But, if there is no room to create a table, or to add a partition
to the table, I want to see this error message.

So, I still prefer my way of doing it (see scripts in my original message)
comparing to Oracle's script, you refer to.

Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
ineyman_at_perceptron.com

-----Original Message-----

Alexander.Feinstein_at_mitchell1.com
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 6:10 PM Received on Tue Jul 22 2003 - 07:38:09 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US